CHAPTER 8

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS

This chapter provides an overview of the major environmental concerns in the Barling Planning Area. Major issues and topics addressed include protection of environmental resources, environmental constraints on development, mitigation of environmental hazards, provision of public utilities and services, and opportunity for energy conservation. Major emphasis will be placed on the Fort Chaffee site because of its past use as a military base which has created certain environmental and health hazards. Also, most of the buildings that currently exist on the site were built in the 1940's, 50's and 60's in which both lead based paint and asbestos were used.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINTS

Environmental factors which affected previous growth patterns in the city now function as both constraints and opportunities for achieving the mature landscape of an established community. In certain instances, factors that were formerly thought of as environmental constraints to development are now seen as resources for the community. However, it is the policy of the City of Barling to limit development in sensitive areas and to maintain vital qualities of the air, water and earth.

Topography

Environmental consequences of changing the topography of sizable areas include changes in viewshed, modification of drainage patterns and elimination of established vegetation cover.

Barling lies east of Fort Smith and south of the Arkansas River causing the city to be landlocked. The topography of the city varies in elevation from approximately 660 feet above mean sea level to 375 feet. The City generally slopes to the north and east towards the river.

Barling has a lot of natural scenery including beautiful old trees which is part of the City's charm. It has a rural, open feeling which the city wishes to sustain and keep in mind when developing the land. The Arkansas River is not only an economic necessity of the area but it also holds an aesthetic quality which the residents of Barling appreciate. Development review should consider the consequences of altered drainage patterns on neighboring properties. Protection of off-site vegetation patterns from the effects of on-site grading and fill should also be considered. The wetlands, the majority existing on the Fort Chaffee site, should be protected because they offer an excellent habitat for many different types of species.

Geology and Soil

Barling lies within the Arkansas Valley Geological section which is primarily a lowland area of the Arkansas River. The predominant geological formations are identified within the Pennsylvania system and include from oldest to youngest: the Atoka, Hartshorne, McAlester, and Savannah.

The Atoka is the oldest unit and contains mostly shale with some sandstone and siltstone. The Hartshorne is fine to very fine grained sandstone with thin to massive bedding. The McAlester formation overlies the Harthshorne and is mostly shale with siltstone and sandstone. The top formation is the Savannah and it is mostly shale with some siltstone with a very limited amount of sandstone. It is very important to consider the types of soil located at a site for development. Development should not take place in areas that are unfit for certain types of development.

Vegetation

Barling is comprised of upland forests, bottomland hardwood forests, tall grass prairies, old fields, maintained cool season grasslands and wetlands. Existing vegetation is a mix of deciduous and coniferous forest species. The wetlands, pond areas, and grassland have been identified as having a high value for forage and habitat to wildlife species in decline. Therefore, it is very important to protect these environments from any type of harm, including development.

Wildlife

A variety of wetland and non-wetland mammal, reptile, amphibian, fish and bird species have been observed in Barling. The American Burying Beetle was found on the Fort Chaffee site and is on the Federal list of endangered species. Viable wildlife habitats are sensitive to development and are becoming scarce. In addition, some species, including deer, birds and a few mammals are found in the most developed residential zones of the city. Rare and sensitive species sometimes require much more effort in their management and protection than more common wildlife species.

Archaeological Resources

Various archaeological surveys have been conducted at Fort Chaffee since 1986. According to the surveys, 28 sites have been determined to be eligible for listing in the National Registry of Historic Places; 21 sites are potentially eligible for listing in the National Registry; and 25 sites were undetermined, but additional investigation was recommended. Many of these sites have included remains of a concentration of Euro-American farmsteads. It is the policy of the city to protect its history.

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS

This section addresses both natural and man-made hazards in the environment.

NOISE

Noise levels in the planning area will likely increase as population density levels increase and as new areas are developed throughout the city, principally because of noise from transportation sources such as interstates, streets, and railroads. As noise levels continue to increase, so will the possibility of adverse effects on the health, behavior, attitudes, and economic well-being of local residents.

Vehicular Noise

Noise from vehicles, especially motorcycles, is a source of annoyance for Barling residents. Although complaints about vehicular noise are centered on major streets and highways, complaints about local streets and public vehicles (emergency and garbage) are also made. Although the city cannot control the amount of noise that vehicles are designed to emit, it can control actual noise emissions which exceed certain State standards. The city can also regulate truck traffic to lower the average noise levels adjacent to restricted streets and highways. Vehicular noise in Barling will probably increase in the future and will affect new areas as additional streets and highways are built.

Railroad Noise

Railroads create very high peak levels of noise, caused primarily by wheel/rail interaction, locomotive noise, and air horns or whistles. Railroad noise is the cause of high levels of annoyance in Barling near street crossings. Furthermore, it is difficult to project increases in railroad noise due to the lack of predictability of operational changes.

Aircraft/Airport Noise

Flight operations at the FCMTC, the 188th Air Guard Unit at Fort Smith Airport the Fort Smith Airport generate noise that will likely interact with more residents in the future as the city continues to grow. The current flight pattern for the Fort Smith Airport includes the Barling water tower on N Terrace. Thus, a significant part of Barling is already affected by flight operations at Fort Smith Airport. Currently, the majority of aircraft at Fort Smith Airport are commuter type aircraft which emit a relatively low level of noise. The majority of loud aircraft noise is emitted by Air Guard Fighter aircraft during their operations. As the region grows, the potential for larger aircraft operating out of the airport could increase. This would increase aircraft noise in Barling.

Fixed Source Noise

Noise emissions from commerce, industry, recreational activities (other than those involving vehicles), construction, and structural sources can be lessened with current technology. Barling has the authority to institute controls for these sources through zoning ordinances, building codes, and noise control ordinances.

Domestic Noise

Domestic noise which involves mechanized equipment or amplified sound can be limited to current or lower levels. Intermittent nuisance noises (such as loud parties, children playing, and dogs barking) are more difficult to control. As population densities increase, the number of occurrences of excess domestic noise will increase if no noise controls are instituted, but the level of noise per incident will probably not increase.

 

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Storage and Disposal

The City of Barling has a contract with Environmental Remediation Services Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma to assist the Barling Fire Department on all HazMat incidences. The City is currently working on a plan to restrict truck traffic to major state highways limiting its exposure to HazMat incidences. There is no available data on the number of hazardous transport trips through the City. However, it is the opinion of city leaders that most hazardous materials traveling through the region do so on the interstate highway system. That system currently does not go through the City of Barling.

In 1998, Sebastian County Solid Waste District in cooperation with Fort Smith City landfill had its first annual household hazardous waste free collection day. The City of Barling is a participant in this program.

HAZARDS UNIQUE TO THE FORT CHAFFEE SITE

This section discusses the types of hazardous waste found at the Fort Chaffee Military Reservation. Items covered include projects for the Installation Restoration Program such as: asbestos, lead-based paint, PCB's, radon, unexploded ordinance, radiological sources, pesticides, herbicides and fungicide usage, medical wastes, and storage tanks.

Installation Restoration Program

The process of cleaning up hazardous waste sites by the Department of the Army is referred to as the Installation Restoration Program (IRP). In addition, a Draft Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS) was prepared. The EBS documents the physical condition of property at the site and contains readily available information (including data collected for the IRP) in regard to storage, use, and disposal of hazardous waste and petroleum products during the life of Fort Chaffee. The Army uses the EBS to determine its obligations under federal environmental laws before it makes any decisions concerning real property transfers. In fact, the completion of an EBS is required by the Department of Defense before any property can be sold, leased, transferred or acquired by another organization.

Asbestos

Information on the potential presence of asbestos in buildings on site was obtained from the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (December 1996). The Fort Chaffee asbestos program consists of identification, monitoring, determination of health hazards, awareness education, removal and disposal of asbestos. All areas of concern have been surveyed for asbestos, and Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) are generally limited to installation buildings which are located overwhelmingly within the cantonment area. Installation personnel estimate that ACM is present in 99 percent of the buildings at Fort Chaffee.

Asbestos removal is generally completed in conjunction with demolition activities, but may also be performed when needed due to deteriorated conditions or to accomplish other maintenance. Asbestos is disposed of in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and Army regulations.

Lead-Based Paint

Nearly all buildings at Fort Chaffee were constructed prior to 1980, generally recognized as the year when lead-based paint (LBP) was no longer permitted to be used in the United States. LBP is estimated to be present in 99 percent of the buildings and structures at Fort Chaffee including those within the excess area. A representative inspection of buildings and structures at Fort Chaffee by base personnel identified that both interior and exterior painted surfaces have a strong likelihood of containing LBP. A significant number of the excess buildings have also been sided with metal siding.

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB's)

Guidance for PCB management of Fort Chaffee comes from the 1989 TRADOC PCBA Policy. The installation underwent a post-wide transformer inventory, testing and replacement program in the mid-1980's. The installation used a temporary accumulation and storage area located in Building 426 and on a concrete pad in the nearby Coal Yard east of building 460, both outside the excess area. All existing PCB transformers and fluid were removed and properly disposed. No PCB-containing materials are known to remain at Fort Chaffee.

Pesticides, Herbicides and Fungicides

Fort Chaffee has a pesticide handling area just south of Roberts Boulevard. Pesticides are stored and mixed in the building. According to EBS, the building has been used for this purpose since the late 1970's. Prior to that, pesticides were stored and mixed in a building located on the southwest corner of Roberts Boulevard and Taylor Avenue.

Previous reports note no evidence of release to the environment. This area was listed as an Area of Concern because of the materials handled and lack of a containment berm.

Medical Waste

Although there appear to be no medical waste hazards at Fort Chaffee, the EBS reports that mercury from broken thermometers has been found in sink drains throughout the hospital area buildings. The EBS finds that it would be unlikely that mercury would be found in any area other than sink drains.

Storage Tanks

Regulated underground tanks at Fort Chaffee are used to hold gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel, and used oil. There are 25 regulated Underground Storage Tanks (UST) on the site. Only two regulated UST's are within the disposal area. These two tanks have passed tightness testing but are scheduled for removal. Removal of regulated UST's is monitored by the ADPCE.

bulletInactive UST's - The tanks and contaminated soil from leaking tanks were removed according to plans prepared by USACE Little Rock. Fort Chaffee personnel oversaw the removal contractor and were responsible for collection and evaluation of all post-excavation sampling. A 100 parts per million (ppm) cleanup level for THP was used for the removal of all tanks. This level was approved by the ADPCE.
bulletActive UST's - Two sites with active UST's are known to have releases. Tanks at Building 2350 leaked gasoline into the surrounding soils. Contaminated soil was removed following a plan prepared by Fort Chaffee Facilities and Engineering. Downgraded ground water sampling detected levels of benzene and toulene below MCL's, which pose no threat to human health of the environment.

Tanks at Buildings 402 and 403 have also leaked. Fort Chaffee has proposed that these tanks will be removed and contamination addressed when BRAC funding for removal of all Fort Chaffee UST systems is approved. One formerly active UST site, Building 145, has been demolished and the tanks and contaminated soil removed. Ground water sampling has indicated no evidence of fuel contamination.

Development Implications

Environmental questions regarding a piece of property are some of the most significant issues raised in evaluating the development potential of a parcel of land. In the case of the Fort Chaffee Military Reservation, the redevelopment of process is even more complex because environmental questions could make it difficult to transfer the property from the Army to another user until responsibility and liability for possible cleanup is resolved.

Sixteen of the 35 sites designated as Solid Waste Management Units at Fort Chaffee have been classified as No Action Required. There are 10 sites requiring Removal Action or Completion Report/Record of Decision (ROD) and 9 sites requiring Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS).

A vast majority of the buildings which have been identified as surplus contain asbestos and/or lead-based paint. In most instances, it may not be financially practical to remove the materials from the buildings. Consequently, the most prudent course of action may be the demolition or removal of many structures. Such is the case in the former hospital area where all of the buildings have deteriorated and are open to the elements and contain both asbestos and lead-based paint and must be demolished. The barracks and motorpool areas also pose development challenges for the site. If there is no market demand for these structures, they will have to be demolished over time to allow more productive development to occur. However, the demolition and disposal of these buildings will have to be accomplished under existing Federal regulations for asbestos and lead-based paint removal.

PROVISION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

Fire Protection

The City of Barling has a combination Fire Department consisting of one full time chief, six full time firefighters, two part time firefighter positions and 50 volunteers. The City maintains its main station in the City Hall complex on Church Street, consisting of two pumper units and one fire rescue truck.

On October 1, 1997 the City entered into a contract with Fort Chaffee Manuever Training Center (FCMTC) to provide fire fighting services for that facility. This agreement provides the City with the use of ten additional pieces of fire fighting capital equipment as well as a fully equipped fire station.

The City has also requested from the Fort Chaffee Public Trust a Public Benefit Conveyance for an additional site for a future fire station.

Water Supply and Distribution

The City of Barling currently purchases water through a contract with the city of Fort Smith. While the existing contract has expired, it is the intent of the City of Barling to enter into a new agreement with the City of Fort Smith. In 1991, the City completed a major water renovation project. The project replaced many of the City's main water lines and added a .5 million gallon water tank. This system is capable of delivering water to any point in the current city at no less than 2250 GPM. This system will be adequate for any anticipated growth within the city limits.

In October 1997, the City of Barling received approval of its application from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, for a Public Benefit Conveyance consisting of the entire water system at Fort Chaffee. A subsequent agreement transferred a portion of that system back to the FCMTC. The transfer will be completed to the City upon completion of the BRAC process. In the interim, the City operates the system under a lease with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers for the sum of $22,500 per year. This will provide the water system for the Fort Chaffee land.

Sewage Collection and Treatment

The city of Barling maintains its own sewage collection system. Treatment is provided under contract with the City of Fort Smith to treat effluent at its Massard Creek plant.

In October 1997, the City of Barling received form the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services approval of its application for a Public Benefit Conveyance of the entire sewage collection and treatment facility at Fort Chaffee. The City is anticipating approval from the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers for its request to connect the City's collection system to the waste water treatment lagoons at Fort Chaffee.

The City has also requested an additional 350 acres of excess land adjoining the existing lagoons at Fort Chaffee. This land and the existing lagoons should provide sufficient waste water treatment capacity for the next 30 years. Additional capacity can be obtained by adding new primary lagoons in the 350 acres requested.

Solid Waste Collection and Disposal

The City of Barling maintains its own solid waste collection service. In addition, the City, through a grant from the Sebastian County Waste District, provides yard waste collection service. The City is currently working on a grant from the same district to provide curb side recycling to its residents. All waste collected by the City is transported to the Fort Smith regional landfill for disposal.

ENERGY CONSERVATION

Existing Programs

The City has no existing program for energy conservation. However, through its policies and procedures in this plan the City has shown a willingness to begin new energy conservation programs in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

POLICIES AND STRATEGIES

Policy: The City will exercise its responsibility to protect environmental resources.

Strategies:

1) Maintain wetlands.

2) Continue utilization of resources along the Arkansas River which are consistent with open space character such as farming, fishing, grazing, and energy generation from natural processes.

3) Maintain environmental corridors such as creeks with native vegetation; protect important plant or wildlife habitats in the hills such as woodland, forest, and scrub areas.

4) Slow run off with planting, retention ponds and stream bank restoration; limit non porous paving and further creek channelization.

5) Avoid extensive grading in hill areas and any development on unstable soils; maintain plant materials which stabilize hill areas.

6) Recognize the role plant materials have in moderating the climate and improving air quality; give preference to drought-tolerant plant materials in city landscaping.

7) Support enforcement and improvement of air quality regulations.

8) Guide development into patterns which reduce automobile usage since automobiles are the principal source of air pollution.

9) Control waste discharge to avoid contamination of water resources, damage to the ecology and hill erosion.

10) Utilize dredged silt and processed waste sludge productively, such as for marsh restoration and park development.

11) Consider a city compost yard to utilize waste plant materials.

12) Encourage aggressive recycling program.

Policy: The City will seek to protect the public health, safety, and welfare against the adverse effects of excessive noise, consistent with the economic and environmental well being of the City, and reaffirm desirability of quiet surroundings.

Strategies:

1) Provide educational material and assistance to the public regarding noise mitigation.

2) Maintain conformity of new development with the principles and standards for land use compatibility, noise exposure, and noise mitigation.

3) Cooperate with adjacent jurisdictions and other agencies involved in noise mitigation; work with transportation companies and/or agencies to mitigate noise impacts.

4) Consider potential noise impacts in evaluating proposals for new transportation facilities, including streets and highways.

5) Encourage the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department to construct noise barriers along State highways adjacent to noise-sensitive uses.

6) Investigate methods for decreasing local street noise, such as modification of paving materials, removal of surface irregularities, and synchronization of signals to facilitate smooth traffic flow.

7) Enforce existing traffic regulations relating to vehicular noise.

8) Review truck routes and related ordinances with the purpose of lessening the impacts of truck noise on noise-sensitive land uses.

9) Enact a community noise control ordinance to reduce fixed source noise problems, including those resulting from domestic sources, excessively loud construction, commercial and industrial activities.

10) Enact a noise ordinance limiting noise levels emitted from electronic sound devices, such as radios and tape players, which impact nearby residences or public places such as parks and streets.

 

11) Encourage mitigation of noise through appropriate site planning, building orientation, interior layout, and building materials.

Policy: The City will seek adequate precautions from hazardous materials.

Strategies:

1) Implement a Hazardous Materials Program and enforcement ordinance on use and storage of hazardous materials.

2) Coordinate with state and federal agencies to provide appropriate labeling on vehicles transporting hazardous materials through the city and to encourage utilization of designated routes.

3) Maintain a suitable buffer zone between industrial firms involved with hazardous materials and residential areas.

4) Maintain city response mechanisms to major spills of hazardous substances.

5) Establish collection programs for household toxic wastes.

6) Coordinate with Fort Smith and/or Sebastian County in developing a program for disposal of hazardous wastes by small generators.

7) Provide educational materials concerning hazardous materials to the general public and enforcement agencies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Policy: The City will seek to provide an appropriate level of fire protection.

Strategies:

1) Adopt and enforce building and fire codes which will provide a level of risk to life and property from fire commensurate with the fire suppression capabilities available to the City.

2) Continue to maintain a well trained and equipped fire suppression force commensurate with the level of risk to life and property from fire.

3) Provide a program of fire safety education for all citizens, but directed primarily at the high risk population (senior citizens and young children).

 

Policy: Barling will promote energy conservation.

Strategies:

1) Promote transit, bike, and pedestrian circulation.

2) Encourage mix of shopping, employment, and residential use in areas to be more intensely developed.

3) Monitor energy use of city facilities and street lighting; utilize public buildings to demonstrate solar orientation and energy conservation principles.

4) Emphasize energy conservation measures for existing development; encourage use of public energy audits and financing for improvements.

5) Study feasibility of requiring energy audit and performance of cost effective conservation measures when properties are sold (such as ceiling insulation, weatherstripping, etc.)

6) Support the improvement and enforcement of State energy conservation standards for new construction.

 

7) Emphasize solar orientation in site planning for new construction; manifest the direction south with provision for passive winter heating and summer shading unless there are countervailing considerations peculiar to the site.

8) Develop solar access ordinance to restrict blockage of sunshine by adjoining development.

9) Promote solar systems where cost effective.

10) Promote energy education with fairs, bike or solar tours, workshops, or media campaigns.